COVID-19 and the NICU: #Zeroseparation.

COVID-19's first wave created chaos for new NICU families as they struggled to cope with the challenge of a fragile infant along with a pandemic. Safety was paramount due to a lack of understanding around how the virus transmits, but much has been learned since then. The next wave of the virus needs to have a rethink around family separation. World leader organization European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants (EFCNI) provides insight into the challenges with the first wave and suggests ideas around rethinking how families interact with their baby in the subsequent waves.

COVID-19 preparedness-a survey among neonatal care providers in low- and middle-income countries.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate COVID-19 pandemic preparedness, available resources, and guidelines for neonatal care delivery among neonatal health care providers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) across all continents. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, web-based survey administered between May and June, 2020. RESULTS: Of 189 invited participants in 69 LMICs, we received 145 (77%) responses from 58 (84%) countries. The pandemic provides significant challenges to neonatal care, particularly in low-income countries. Respondents noted exacerbations of preexisting shortages in staffing, equipment, and isolation capabilities. In Sub-Saharan Africa, 9/35 (26%) respondents noted increased mortality in non-COVID-19-infected infants. Clinical practices on cord clamping, isolation, and breastfeeding varied widely, often not in line with World Health Organization guidelines. Most respondents noted family access restrictions, and limited shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Many LMICs face an exacerbation of preexisting resource challenges for neonatal care during the pandemic. Variable approaches to care delivery and deviations from guidelines provide opportunities for international collaborative improvement.

Ethical issues in treatment of babies born at 22 weeks of gestation.

Many centres now report that more than half of babies born at 22 weeks survive and most survivors are neurocognitively intact. Still, many centres do not offer life-sustaining treatment to babies born this prematurely. Arguments for not offering active treatment reflect concerns about survival rates, rates of neurodevelopmental impairment and cost. In this essay, I examine each of these arguments and find them ethically problematic. I suggest that current data ought to lead to two changes. First, institutional culture should change at institutions that do not offer treatment to babies born at 22 weeks. Second, we need more research to understand best practices for these tiny babies.

Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on breastfeeding rates in a neonatal intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVES: To find out if the expressed breast milk delivery rate to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for babies who were hospitalized for any reason other than COVID-19, and exclusive breastfeeding (EB) rates between discharge date and 30th day of life of those babies were affected by COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Babies who were hospitalized before the date first coronavirus case was detected in our country were included as control group (CG). The study group was divided into two groups; study group 1 (SG1): the mothers whose babies were hospitalized in the period when mother were asked not to bring breast milk to NICU, study group 2 (SG2): the mothers whose babies were hospitalized after the date we started to use the informed consent form for feeding options. The breast milk delivery rates to NICU during hospitalization and EB rates between discharge and 30th day of life were compared between groups. RESULTS: Among 154 mother-baby dyads (CG, n=50; SG1, n=46; SG2, n=58), the percentage of breast milk delivery to NICU was 100%, 79% for CG, SG2, respectively (p<0.001). The EB rate between discharge and 30th day of life did not change between groups (CG:90%, SG1:89%, SG2:75.9; p=0.075). CONCLUSIONS: If the mothers are informed about the importance of breast milk, the EB rates are not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in short term, even if the mothers are obligatorily separated from their babies. The breast milk intake rate of the babies was lowest while our NICU protocol was uncertain, and after we prepared a protocol this rate increased.

Neonatos en tratamiento con nutriciones parenterales individualizadas, candidatos a recibir nutriciones parenterales estandarizadas / Neonates treated with individualized parenteral nutrition who are candidates to receive standardized parenteral nutrition

OBJETIVO: cuantificar el número de pacientes neonatos en tratamiento con nutriciones parenterales individualizadas (NPI), candidatos a recibir nutriciones parenterales estandarizadas (NPE), así como el número de días. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: estudio prospectivo observacional y descriptivo de cohortes. Los criterios de inclusión fueron: pacientes neonatos con indicación de nutrición parenteral (NP) y prescripción individualizada. Los criterios de exclusión fueron: pacientes que no hubieran iniciado la diuresis, con necesidades nutricionales específicas, con alteraciones del equilibrio ácido-base y/o con contraindicación de la NPE. Se emplearon variables relacionadas con el paciente (sexo, peso, semanas de gestación y días de vida) y relacionadas con el tratamiento (aportes de la NPI). Fijando como criterio de conversión el volumen de NP, se calcularon los aportes teóricos con la NPE. El criterio para que un paciente fuera candidato a recibirla fue que todos los aportes teóricos estuvieran dentro de los requerimientos de referencia. RESULTADOS: se incluyeron 33 neonatos (9 mujeres) en tratamiento con NPI y con 94 prescripciones. La mediana de peso de los pacientes incluidos en el estudio fue de 2,14 (RIC: 0,9) kg, nacidos a las 35 (RIC: 3) semanas de gestación y en los que se inició NP entre los días 0 y 4. El 71 % (22/31) de los pacientes en el 54,1 % (46/85) de sus prescripciones fueron candidatos a recibir NPE administrada por vía central durante 1 a 8 días, mientras que ningún paciente fue candidato a recibirla por vía periférica. CONCLUSIONES: en nuestro centro, el 71 % de los pacientes nenonatos en tratamiento con NPI administrada por vía central son candidatos a recibir NPE, lo que fomenta la normalización del soporte nutricional en esta población

OBJETIVE: to quantify the number of neonates treated with individualized parenteral nutrition (IPN) who were candidates to receive standardized parenteral nutrition (SPN), and to calculate their treatment duration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: this was a prospective, observational, descriptive cohort study. Inclusion criteria were: neonates with indication of parenteral nutrition (PN) and individualized prescription. Exclusion criteria included: patients who had not started diuresis, with specific nutritional needs, altered acid-base balance, and/or contraindication to receive SPN. Included variables were patient-related (gender, weight, weeks of gestation, and days of life) and treatment-related regarding IPN composition. Setting the volume of PN as the conversion criterion, theoretical contributions were calculated with the SPN. The criterion for a patient to be a candidate to receive SPN was that all the theoretical contributions calculated were within the reference requirements range. RESULTS: a total of 33 neonates (9 women) received IPN with 94 prescriptions. The median weight of the patients included in the study was 2.14 (IQR, 0.9) kg, and they were born at 35 (IQR, 3) weeks of gestation. PN began between 0 and 4 days of life. In all, 71 % (22/31) of the patients in 54.1 % of their (46/85) prescriptions were candidates to receive SPN via central administration for 1 to 8 days, whereas no patient was candidate to receive SPN via peripheral administration. CONCLUSIONS: in our center, 71 % of neonates treated with central administration of IPN are candidates to receive SPN, thus promoting the normalization of nutritional support in this population

Reducing Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Extravasation in Neonates: A Quality Improvement Project.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to reduce total and severe peripheral intravenous extravasation (PIVE) incidence by 40% in our neonatal intensive care unit. SETTING/APPROACH: This quality improvement initiative was performed at an academic, free-standing suburban children's hospital, in a level 4 neonatal intensive care unit from June 2017 to April 2018. Baseline extravasation data for a period of 6 months prior to the initiative were reviewed, along with a nursing knowledge questionnaire and random audits of catheter stabilization techniques. A Pareto chart and a key driver diagram were created to identify the most common causes of extravasations and lead to a series of process changes. We implemented 4 Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles: (1) dressing protocol for peripheral intravenous vascular (PIV) catheter securement that instituted standardized securement and safer equipment; (2) education on PIV assessment and maintenance, concentrating on hourly evaluation and documentation; (3) guidance algorithm for PIVE identification and treatment; and (4) escalation policy, limiting the number of placement attempts and increased use of a "superuser" team. OUTCOMES: The overall prevalence of extravasations decreased by 54%, from 73 preintervention to 40 at postintervention. At baseline, 52% (38/73) extravasations were severe; however, those in the severe category decreased by 35% (14/40) postintervention. The overall rate of adherence to the PIV catheter management algorithm approached 95%; whereas adherence to the securement guideline fluctuated between 80% and 98%. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: The implementation of these new practice recommendations along with the education has resulted in a decreased rate and severity of extravasation. Frequent audits and reinforcements are integral to sustainment and to ensure accountability for the implemented procedures.

A Multisite Survey of NICU Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions About Family-Centered Care.

BACKGROUND: Family-centered care contributes to improved outcomes for preterm and ill infants. Little is known about the perceptions of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) healthcare professionals regarding the degree to which their NICU practices or values family-centered care. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to describe attitudes and beliefs of NICU healthcare professionals about family-centered care and to explore professional characteristics that might influence those views. METHODS: Data were derived from the baseline phase of a multicenter quasi-experimental study comparing usual family-centered NICU care with mobile-enhanced family-integrated care. Neonatal intensive care unit healthcare professionals completed the Family-Centered Care Questionnaire-Revised (FCCQ-R), a 45-item measure of 9 core dimensions of Current Practice and Necessary Practice for family-centered care. RESULTS: A total of 382 (43%) NICU healthcare professionals from 6 NICUs completed 1 or more of the FCCQ-R subscales, 83% were registered nurses. Total and subscale scores on the Necessary Practice scale were consistently higher than those on the Current Practice scale for all dimensions of family-centered care (mean: 4.40 [0.46] vs 3.61 [0.53], P < .001). Only years of hospital experience and NICU site were significantly associated with Current Practice and Necessary Practice total scores. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Ongoing assessment of the perceptions of NICU healthcare professionals regarding their current practice and beliefs about what is necessary for the delivery of high-quality family-centered care can inform NICU education, quality improvement, and maintenance of family-centered care during the COVID-19 pandemic. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Further research is needed to identify additional factors that predict family-centered care perceptions and behaviors.

Patient X-ray exposure and ALARA in the neonatal intensive care unit: Global patterns.

A literature review was conducted to determine norms for practice in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) around the world, given the harmful risks associated with radiation exposure at a very young age; risk of radiation-induced harm later in life increases with every X-ray image taken, more so for younger premature babies. Empirical studies including a measurement of radiation dose in a NICU, published after the year 2000 in a peer-reviewed journal, were collected. Measured doses to patients or X-ray phantoms, number of X-rays per stay and conclusions with recommendations made in response to these values were compared for 25 studies from around the world. The number of X-rays a patient underwent during a NICU stay ranged from 0 to 159. Younger, lower birth weight patients consistently had the greatest number of X-rays per stay. Recommended action based on measured dose ranged from extensive (to minimize risk to neonates) to minimal (to reduce risk) to none (because imaging benefits outweigh patient risk), with no consistent pattern linking recommended action with dose quantity. This demonstrates a broad range of interpretations of the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) concept. These findings indicate a disparity in the response to neonatal X-ray dose concerns on a global scale, posing a public health risk to this particular neonatal population. More up-to-date imaging protocols and dose limits specifically for the NICU environment with standardized dose monitoring would help minimize this risk to achieve the public health goals of prevention and harm reduction.

Optimal outcome measures for a trial of not routinely measuring gastric residual volume in neonatal care: a mixed methods consensus process.

BACKGROUND: Routine measurement of gastric residual volume to guide feeding is widespread in neonatal units but not supported by high-quality evidence. Outcome selection is critical to trial design. OBJECTIVE: To determine optimal outcome measures for a trial of not routinely measuring gastric residual volume in neonatal care. DESIGN: A focused literature review, parent interviews, modified two-round Delphi survey and stakeholder consensus meeting. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-one neonatal healthcare professionals participated in an eDelphi survey; 17 parents were interviewed. 19 parents and neonatal healthcare professionals took part in the consensus meeting. RESULTS: Literature review generated 14 outcomes, and parent interviews contributed eight additional outcomes; these 22 outcomes were then ranked by 74 healthcare professionals in the first Delphi round where four further outcomes were proposed; 26 outcomes were ranked in the second round by 61 healthcare professionals. Five outcomes were categorised as 'consensus in', and no outcomes were voted 'consensus out'. 'No consensus' outcomes were discussed and voted on in a face-to-face meeting by 19 participants, where four were voted 'consensus in'. The final nine consensus outcomes were: mortality, necrotising enterocolitis, time to full enteral feeds, duration of parenteral nutrition, time feeds stopped per 24 hours, healthcare-associated infection; catheter-associated bloodstream infection, change in weight between birth and neonatal discharge and pneumonia due to milk aspiration. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We have identified outcomes for a trial of no routine measurement of gastric residual volume to guide feeding in neonatal care. This outcome set will ensure outcomes are important to healthcare professionals and parents.

The lived experiences of critically ill infants hospitalised in neonatal intensive care: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal intensive care saves lives, but the environment in which this occurs is complex and has been shown to negatively disrupt some aspects of an infant's early development. Identifying these negative effects has relied on measuring physiological and behavioural responses. Little research has sought to understand and learn from what an individual infant can communicate about their lived experience. AIM: To examine what is known of the lived experiences of infants hospitalised in neonatal intensive care. STUDY DESIGN: A scoping review using the revised Arksey and O'Malley framework was undertaken. Relevant studies, exploring an infant's experience of hospitalisation were identified through a comprehensive, systematic literature search. RESULTS: 4955 articles were retrieved, 88 full texts reviewed, and 23 studies included. We identified no studies that assessed the experience from the infant's perspective. The infant experience was explored using quantitative methodology, characterising, and describing the experience in measurable physiological, behavioural, and neurodevelopmental terms or through the lens of medical outcomes. The environment is described as too loud and too bright and infants are exposed to high levels of medical handling, impacting on physiology, behaviour, sleep, feeding, and both short- and longer-term outcomes. CONCLUSION: The studies captured in this review focused on quantitative, measurable outcomes as a proxy for the experience as it might be felt, interpreted, and processed by an infant. Medical focus has been crucial to advance the field of neonatology, but the review highlights an important gap; the need to explore and better understand the infant's experience through their eyes.

Addressing the Needs of Mothers with Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Secondary Analysis.

PURPOSE: Mothers of infants hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) need to be recognized as essential partners of the care team as their presence and involvement are key to infants' health and developmental outcomes. Addressing mothers' perceived needs is beneficial for the improvement of supportive nursing care; however, little qualitative research on their unmet needs has been conducted in South Korea. This study assessed mothers' perspectives on their NICU experiences and their unmet needs within the South Korean cultural context. METHOD: A cross-sectional, multicentered, secondary analysis study was conducted using the written responses to an open-ended questionnaire. Of the 344 NICU-experienced mothers, 232 throughout South Korea (seven cities and five provinces) voluntarily completed the questionnaire via smartphone-based or web-based surveys. Their narrative responses were analyzed using thematic content analysis guided by the critical incident technique. RESULTS: Four themes emerged. NICU-experienced mothers of preterm infants referred to the "family-friendly environment" (16.4%) as a positive experience. The greatest unmet need was "relationship-based support" (58.2%), followed by "information and education-based support" (20.0%) and "system-level challenges" (5.4%). CONCLUSION: The importance of creating a family-friendly NICU environment should be emphasized by ensuring 24-hour unrestricted access and encouraging active parental involvement in infant care, as well as actively supporting NICU families through supportive words and actions. The assurance of antiinfection management and better staffing levels should be fundamentally guaranteed to NICU staff.

The Social Organization of Neonatal Nurses' Feeding Work.

PURPOSE: We report findings from an institutional ethnography (IE) of nurses' work of feeding infants within an increasingly technical organization of NICUs. SAMPLE: Five primary informants; 18 secondary informants. DESIGN: The institutional ethnographic approach included field observations, interviews, and phone and e-mail conversations. Our analysis followed accounts of what actually happened within the textual organization of nurses' work. MAIN OUTCOME: Nurses' feeding practices are directed by protocols that arise within multiple documentation systems and clinical technologies. These systems produce barriers to nurses' efforts to skillfully feed infants. RESULTS: Prioritization of quality and safety perspectives can obscure and constrain the ordinary yet critical clinical reasoning neonatal nurses employ during feeding work. Clinical technologies that have been developed to improve safety can paradoxically disrupt the ability of nurses to respond in the moment to neonatal feeding cues. This finding provides nurses, leaders, and policymakers with insight into why policies and procedures may not be followed as expected.

Enhanced Neonatal Resuscitation Provider Course for Novice Learners.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of an enhanced format of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) course on new clinicians' comfort level in providing neonatal resuscitation. DESIGN: Pilot project based on the Plan-Do-Study-Act framework with a pretest-posttest design. SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM: This course was developed in response to an assessment of new NRP clinicians who self-reported low competence and comfort with selected steps of neonatal resuscitation after participating in our system's usual NRP provider course. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of nurses, respiratory therapists, and physicians taking the NRP course. INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS: The enhanced-format course facilitated hands-on practice at skills stations before the integrated skills station and simulation/debriefing component. The level of comfort in key areas of neonatal resuscitation was assessed in a postintervention survey on a 4-point Likert scale. RESULTS: After completion of this enhanced-format course, participants reported an increase in comfort level with equipment and selected resuscitation skills. CONCLUSION: An enhanced NRP provider course targeted to the unique learning needs of novice learners may increase their comfort level and satisfaction with newborn resuscitation knowledge and skills.

Neuroprotection Care Bundle Implementation to Decrease Acute Brain Injury in Preterm Infants.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the impact of an evidence-based neuroprotection care bundle on the risk of brain injury in extremely preterm infants. METHODS: We implemented a neuroprotection care bundle consisting of a combination of neuroprotection interventions such as minimal handling, midline head position, deferred cord clamping, and protocolization of hemodynamic and respiratory managements. These interventions targeted risk factors for acute brain injury in extremely preterm infants (born at gestational age less than 29 weeks) during the first three days of birth. Implementation occurred in a stepwise manner, including care bundle development by a multidisciplinary care team based on previous evidence and experience, standardization of outcome assessment tools, and education. We compared the incidence of the composite outcome of acute preterm brain injury or death preimplementation and postimplementation. RESULTS: Neuroprotection care bundle implementation associated with a significant reduction in acute brain injury risk factors such as the use of inotropes (24% before, 7% after, P value < 0.001) and fluid boluses (37% before, 19% after, P value < 0.001), pneumothorax (5% before, 2% after, P value = 0.002), and opioid use (19% before, 7% after, P value < 0.001). Adjusting for confounding factors, the neuroprotection care bundle significantly reduced death or severe brain injury (adjusted odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.59; P value < 0.001) and severe brain injury (adjusted odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.17 to 0.58; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of neuroprotection care bundle targeting predefined risk factors is feasible and effective in reducing acute brain injury in extremely preterm infants.

Neonates Hospitalized with Community-Acquired SARS-CoV-2 in a Colorado Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

IMPORTANCE: The novel coronavirus 2019 (SARS-CoV-2) has been well described in adults. Further, the impact on older children and during the perinatal time is becoming better studied. As community spread increases, it is important to recognize that neonates are vulnerable to community spread as well. The impact that community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 has in the neonatal time period is unclear, as this population has unique immunity considerations. OBJECTIVE: To report on a case series of SARS-CoV-2 in neonates through community acquisition in the USA. DESIGN: This is an early retrospective study of patients admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) identified as having SAR-CoV-2 through positive real-time polymerase chain reaction assay of nasopharyngeal swabs. FINDINGS: Three patients who required admission to the NICU between the ages of 17 and 33 days old were identified. All 3 had ill contacts in the home or had been to the pediatrician and presented with mild to moderate symptoms including fever, rhinorrhea, and hypoxia, requiring supplemental oxygen during their hospital stay. One patient was admitted with neutropenia, and the other 2 patients became neutropenic during hospitalization. None of the patients had meningitis or multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Infants with community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 may require hospitalization due to rule-out sepsis guidelines if found to have fever and/or hypoxia. Caregivers of neonates should exercise recommended guidelines before contact with neonates to limit community spread of SARS-CoV-2 to this potentially vulnerable population, including isolation, particularly as asymptomatic cases become prevalent.

Implementing NIDCAP training in a low-middle-income country: Comparing nurses and physicians' attitudes.

BACKGROUND: The Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) provides developmentally supportive environment for preterm infants and their families. Few studies evaluated staff perceptions about NIDCAP implementation and its effect on infant and parents and working conditions. AIMS: To assess the perception and experience of NICU staff during the NIDCAP implementation. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional anonymous online survey. SUBJECTS: 57 NICU staff (29 nurses and 28 doctors) who were present at least one year prior to and during the implementation of NIDCAP training in a tertiary care center. OUTCOME MEASURES: A standard questionnaire addressing attitude, perceived behavioral control, subjective norm, intention, behavior and NIDCAP impact related to NICU conditions was used after initiating developmental care activities and NIDCAP training in the unit from June 2014 to May 2018. RESULTS: Forty-six doctors and nurses filled the questionnaire; they scored ≥3 out of 5 on all the questionnaire items. Nurses scored significantly higher than doctors (mean 4.00 ± 036) versus (3.57 ± 0.30) (p < 0.001) on the overall NIDCAP score. Specifically, nurses scores were significantly higher for attitude (p < 0.001), perceived behavioral control (p = 0.029); subjective norm (p = 0.011), intention (p = 0.024) and behavior (p < 0.001) questions. CONCLUSION: The implementation of NIDCAP in a low-middle income country was perceived as a positive experience for both nurses and doctors: It was thought to have improved infant care and wellbeing as well as the staff relationship with parents, however working conditions remained a challenge. More studies are needed to address areas of improvement for implementation.

Resuscitation outcomes for weekend deliveries of very low birthweight infants.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the association between weekend (Saturday and Sunday) deliveries of very low birthweight (VLBW) infants and delivery room outcomes in the 'golden hour' after birth. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective cohort study using California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative data from participating neonatal intensive care units. PATIENTS: The study population after exclusions was 26 515 VLBW infants born in California from 2010 to 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Delivery room outcomes assessed included: chest compressions, epinephrine, intubation prior to continuous positive airway pressure ventilation, 5 min Apgar <4, admission hypothermia and death within 12 hours. To adjust for potential confounders, we fit multivariate regression models controlling for two sets of infant, maternal and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Infants delivered on weekends were less likely to have been prenatally diagnosed with intrauterine growth restriction but were otherwise not significantly different in gestational age, ethnicity, sex or maternal risk factors than those born during weekdays. Caesarean deliveries were less common on weekends, while vaginal deliveries were consistent across all days. After adjusting for sex and race, weekend delivery was associated with delivery room chest compressions (OR: 1.12, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.24) and lower 5 min Apgar (OR: 1.11, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.21). CONCLUSION: In this population-based study of VLBW infants, there was an increase in chest compressions for infants born on the weekend. More research is needed on the differences between populations born on weekdays versus weekends, and how these may contribute to observed associations.